The New Math Book
Science of Science Page
OK, here it is, The
New Math Book Science of Science Page.
This page is being written by me, Thee Ace Man. And a story to go
with this. There was a rift in thinking in the scientific
community started by others but noted by Albert, who was seen as the
"World's Smartest" until his passing in 1955. Albert was actually
not happy with the term 'smartest' as he felt that that term had a
connotation of being as smart as you could be. Albert never felt
smartest himself so he came up with an unofficial title of "World's
Smarter" which Albert was more than happy with. On passing, the
"World's Smartest" title went to Dr. Stephen, whereas the "World's
Smarter" title was passed on to Sir Nicholas (Nick), Albert's last
'assistant' before passing away in 1955. As this was an
'unofficial' title, there are no real rules or such associated with
"World's Smarter". World's Smartest is assigned from the time it
is assigned until death. From Charles to Albert to Dr.
Stephen. Anyway, In April / May 1979, Both myself, Ace, and Sir
Nicholas shared the "World's Smarter" title. Sir Nicholas passed
away in December 2009 thus leaving myself, as far as I know, being the
only one having the title of World's Smarter. Someone else got a
187 on the IQ test but I don't know if Nick ever even met this
person. From Albert to Sir Nicholas to Sir Nicholas and Ace to
now just Ace (Me). Albert knew that politics would keep Sir
Nicholas, Nick, from getting the World's Smartest title. Sir
Nicholas also felt as Albert did about the 'smartest'
connotation. So not getting the title of smartest was not really
a disappointment to Nick, it was just that with all the other great
minds of the time, why Dr. Stephen (who was one of Nick's accusers of
Nick not doing his own work, which Nick did do his own work)? I
heard Dr. Stephen got it because he was the one suggested that seemed
least likely to 'rock the boat' like Charles and Albert had done before
as World's Smartest. Nick seemed overqualified for 'rocking the
boat' but was still a suggestion. So a rift occured and still
exists. Myself, I prefer Smarter to Smartest as well, and how
about you? Read on...
Let's get started by defining what 'science' is shall we?
Science is a study of the universe around us in an attempt to make
sense of it all in terms we can understand or possibly learn to
Yup, pretty vague here. There are all kinds of scientific fields
to explore - space, time, biological (animal), mathematics, life,
death, botanical (plants), atmospheric, chemical, behavioral,
everything, anything, etc. etc.
Let's start with the six known
(and possibly more unknown) states of matter (matter is substance and
substance has a form [state]).
First state, gas - gas is usually invisible in sight to us but
surrounds most things within our atmosphere. Gases like oxygen,
nitrogen, hydrogen, helium, etc.
Second state, vapor - vapor is thought of as an in between state but is
actually its own state. Vapor may be part gas, part solid, part
liquid, part kolloid but is often thought of as the term 'mist'.
Anything misty is a vapor. Anything foggy is a vapor as
well. Clouds are vapor as well.
Third state, liquid - liquid is thought of as fluid. Fluids like
water, oil, hydraulic fluid, etc.
Fourth state, kolloid - kolloid is like a liquid but also like a
solid. Kolloid is semi-solid and semi-liquid. Gelatin is an
example of a kolloid.
Fifth state, solid - solid has definite shape and form and a
hardness. Solid as a rock.
Sixth state, spark - spark is the release of energy within or without a
substance of matter. Electrical sparks, lightning, explosions,
And to combine these, let's talk about the composition of the human
body. You have skin (kolloid), bones (solid), blood (liquid),
lungs (kolloid), air (gas / vapor), fingernails (solid), eyes
(kolloid), brain (kolloid), ear drums (solid / kolloid), saliva (liquid
/ kolloid), and in some odd cases thoughts (sparks).
And what about antimatter, emptiness (void), metallic, and spirit, and
so on and so forth? Well, things are as they are, aren't
they? Science is the study of everything, isn't it?
These are particles. Matter. Although a particle may be
small or large it can be measured. Which brings us to the study
of the wave frequency of particles. Many particles can be mobile
(such as light particles) and some may be immobile (such as
rocks). A moving particle is said to be in an 'excited'
state. How excited depends on how fast it may be moving.
Speed of particles is measured in what are called 'wave
frequencies'. Infrared particles tend to generate heat.
Microwave particles also generate heat. Both microwave and
infrared particles are both invisible to the eye but they can be
measured and do exist. Shockwaves, magnetic waves, gravitational
waves, sound waves, brain waves, and so on. Moving
particles. Movement. A nice, simple instrument known as a
(a triangular shaped piece of glass) can be used to show particular
movement. Visible light shows up in a prism in distinct bands
which match the bands of a rainbow. Waves lower than visible
light (infrared, microwave) appear below the light spectrum whilst
there is ultraviolet and three distinct bands (alpha, beta, gamma) that
appear above the light spectrum. But if visible light is the
highest speed you can go before 'going back in time' then how are
distinct bands of light possible above the visible light
spectrum? If a particle supposedly goes back in time after
reaching the speed of light, then how are ultra violet, alpha, beta,
and gamma particles possible? Yes, something definitely wrong
with the 'time / space' continuum theory. The equation actually
deals with the speed of light times itself as being equilibrium, not
just the speed of light. But theories are just
that, theories. The thought is that if you go as fast as the
speed of light that time will stop then faster than the speed of light
and time will reverse. With that thought, ultra violet, alpha,
beta, and gamma particles could not exist. They do exist.
So. Further study is definitely needed.
How about a study of friction now. Friction is caused by moving
particles coming in contact with other particles (moving or
nonmoving). A direct result of friction is heat. Rub your
hands together. Friction. Heat. Moving
particles. Our Sun is a HUGE collection of moving
particles. Now look to the sky. Yes there are particles of
light coming from the Sun through our atmosphere thus slowing down from
the friction of traveling through the atmosphere. Also particles
in space (debris and such) itself as the Earth rotates around its axis
and around the Sun. The Earth's axis is tilted at about 66 2/3
degrees and as such, the north part of the Earth as well as the south
part of the Earth have periods where they tilt away from the Sun as the
Earth revolves around the Sun. The middle section (equator area)
is not affected as much by the tilt. When tilted away (north and
south), not as much light comes in contact with the atmosphere.
When tilted towards, more contact. Also, when tilted away, the
light is deflected more and when titled towards more direct and
nondeflected. The seasons. Spring, summer, winter,
fall. More friction in summer, thus more heat. Also, more
plant life, more oxygen. Less plant life, desert. Not that
much oxygen or carbon dioxide in the desert. Or is there?
Plants breathe carbon dioxide and produce oxygen, whilst animals
breathe oxygen and produce carbon dioxide. Not much life in a
desert is there? Has anyone ever measured the levels of carbon
dioxide or oxygen in a desert compared to elsewhere? Such is
science nowadays. Can't make money in a desert so why
bother? It is as it is. Our Moon seems to be a big
desert. No oxygen or carbon dioxide on the Moon or is
there? So many unanswered questions. Such is science.
Always busy with studying something. Busy, busy, busy.
Study, study study. THINKE (Take Heart In Not Knowing
Everything). But it is something to think about.
And what about the atmospheric composition itself? The outer
hydrosphere (hydrogen), heliosphere (helium), lithosphere (lithium),
stratosphere, ionosphere (formerly magnetosphere), etc. Our
immediate atmosphere seems to be comprised of a lot of
carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, and more. A good mix of
different gases. As you head farther out from the Earth's
surface, the gases seem to separate out according to molecular
weight. And then out in space, void. No oxygen, hydrogen,
helium, etc. Just space. Particles still exist in space,
but much more spread out and fewer and farther between. Vacuum,
nothingness. Space. Even more to think about.
Even more to think about here. We know that marijuana (canibis)
causes the same feeling as lettuce leaves, banana peels, and more
importantly Nitrous Oxide (laughing gas). We, as true scientists
know that it is the laughing gas that causes the uncontrollable
laughing when high nitrogen content plant life is smoked. But
unlike banana peels, lettuce leaves, and laughing gas, canibis also has
a side effect of creating 'the munchies' aka an uncontrollable urge to
eat. We know what the Nitrogen does, but there is an unknown
ingredient (defined as Tetra HydraCanibinal or THC) which is apparently
what causes the munchies. As far as marijuana smoking and cancer
treatment, it is the THC that helps the cancer patient counteract the
Chemotherapy side effects especially the upset stomach side
effect. Adjusting the Nitrogen level adjusts the 'high' laughing
factor. Adjusting the THC level adjusts the munchie level.
Thus the current lie that higher THC creates a better 'buzz'. No,
in actuality, the higher THC level has created some children that have
an uncontrollable urge to eat and will literally try to eat
themselves. Not a good thing. And for those who thought
that these 'smartest' / 'wealthiest' scientists were honest, they
aren't. I'm 'smarter' not 'smartest' and hopefully it shows
now. Thank you for the sidetrack, now back to our regularly
And what of all this talk of global warming?
Well, the facts are the facts so let's look at those shall we?
First, there is an asteroid that comes near the Earth every 1,024 years
and alters the magnetic pole position of the Earth (roughly 11.74
degrees this last passing in 1998). With the gravitational pull
Earth, the Moon, the Sun, etc., everything would become one big huge
lump. The repulsion of like magnetic poles (North / South) is
what keeps the lump from occuring. The magnetic repulsion from
the Sun to the Earth is what keeps the Earth from crashing into the Sun
through counteracting the gravitational pull between the Earth and the
Around September 23/24, 1998 was the last occurance of this
asteroid. We know that during a time period of roughly 20 years
and roughly 40 years afterwards that our planet goes through some odd
patterns. From 71 BC to 11 BC, 954 AD to 1014 AD, and from 1978
AD to 2038 AD (our current time). During this 60 year span, the
Earth readjusts to the new magnetic pole position hence the odd
weather patterns as to be expected. During these same time
periods we also have an increase of 'doom and gloom' supposed
soothsayers that have selfish reasons for these soothsayings (note,
there's a reason that sooth is not truth). Also, the Sun does not
directly heat the Earth. We know this from the fact that we have
been in space and the temperature outside the Earth's atmosphere is
roughly -30 degrees centegrade. It is the interaction of the
Earth's atmosphere with the particles from the Sun and the angles
thereof in combination of geothermal activity (heat from inside the
Earth given by the Earth's molten core as evidenced by volcanoes and
such) that creates or doesn't create heat (warmth). The
ecosystem. And let's talk seriously about this ecosystem
and animals breathe in oxygen, nitrogen, and such and expel carbon
dioxide. Plants (trees included) breathe in carbon dioxide and
give off oxygen. A nice balancing act between the two life
forms. Fish are fishy and use the oxygen from water. But
also, have you ever seen a fish get out of the water to go to the
bathroom? Me neither. So something fishy there, but I
digress (as usual). The balancing act between animals and plants
is still balancing otherwise animals and plants would start
suffocating, correct? An overabundance of carbon dioxide would
cause animals to die off and suffocate whereas an overabundance of
oxygen would cause plants to die off. Neither is happening at
present time. So why all this talk of environment and 'global
warming' and such? Well, truthfully, money and trying to
get rich quick is why. Think about this. Gasoline uses
carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen in a complex molecular structure. In
perfect combustion (which DOES NOT HAPPEN, honest) gasoline would break
down into water and carbon dioxide. Perfect plant food. Not
so perfect animal food (but water is water). Solar energy, on the
other hand, is actually a very nasty proposition. Point being,
the energy is stored in 'solar collectors', which is just a fancy
diversion from the truth that they are just glorified batteries is
all. And if you think that lithium, lead, sulfur, and such are
NOT toxic substances then may I suggest you try ingesting some to see
for yourself (please do NOT do this, you will DIE, but if you insist
then I have nothing wrong with decreasing the surplus population of
idiots out there. Try with gasoline too if you must).
Smokescreen extreme. NO SUBSTANCE
CONTAINED IN ANY BATTERY IS KNOWN TO BE GOOD TO THE
ENVIRONMENT!!! Point blank. ALL BATTERIES CHEMICALLY BREAK
DOWN AND BECOME USED UP, THUS BECOMING BIOHAZARDS!!! Point blank2.
The current weather trends are from the Earth's magnetic pole
shift. If it was atmospheric (coal combustion, overpopulation,
etc.) then the effects would be noted in plants and/or animals
accordingly. As noted from the past, the shift adjustment appears
about 60 years in length. 2038. Who'd have guessed?
The guy that said that the rings around Saturn weren't solid (since
around 1974 before we found out the truth). I have an idea for a
system using magnetic repulsion as an engine but I have not yet
developed a working version yet. In the meantime, DON'T GIVE IN
TO PANIC AND BS. Please. It is just a ploy to get rich
quick from people that already have WAY too much money as it is.
But get smarter. Please. Ask them how long before the
batteries need replacing and wait for a response. Also ask how
much it costs to replace a complete set of 'solar collectors' and about
how long before the replacement will be needed. Remember too,
'solar panels' are what convert the sunlight (if there is any), whilst
'solar collectors' is the term for the 'batteries' that store this
conversion for later use. Try not to let them confuse you.
They will try, but try harder, OK. Yes, you will have to bluntly
ask "What about the batteries needing replacing?" and wade through even
more runaround. Yes, it is
designed to be an even MORE expensive alternative for some strange
reason. But after you convert to solar, what choices do you have
left? Even worst, what if you live in an area with little
sunlight or sunlight only six months out of the year? Just
sayin'. They won't, so I did. Just sayin'2.
Ozone? OK, since ozone supposedly exists around all living
things, then I propose this 'ozone person' coat himself in layers of
ozone and stay underwater for at least ten minutes. Don't worry,
the ozone replenishes itself so he'll be fine and protected and we'll
definitely make sure that no greenhouse gases are in the water (liquid)
before dunking. Or better yet, if this ozone person would finally
admit that ozone, as he has defined, just does not exist outside his
own imagination (fat chance but worth a try). Hogwash. Phoney Baloney.
Note, living organisms (as discussed
on the Meaning of Life Page) do actually have an aura around them of
'sparks' but that's different. These aura sparks are not visible
to most, but do exist. An aura may be seen and measured with
proper equipment. Same as there is a magnetic field (called the
ionosphere) generated around the Earth through the magnetic poles and
such. But this ionic layer and the aura layer around living
organisms is not in any way affected by greenhouse gases or such as it
electromagnetic and not affected by such things. There is no
ozone layer in existence nor ozone
period. Yes, a HUGE rift in the scientific
community that still exists to this day apparently. The true
scientists who look for ways to be smarter and the others who
look for ways to be the smartest
wealthiest. To each their own. I
where I stand and I never bought battery or solar company stocks so I'm
not worried about being honest. And you?
And note also, this information is coming from "off the top of my head"
in observations I have made or events that I have been a part of.
An attempt has been made to adhere to scientific namings and such for
these observations. I did not think of all of the namings of this
stuff on my own. As such, feel free to read as you wish.
The scientific community is made of many different individuals and as
such, many times it becomes difficult to identify who came up with what
and who actually did or thought of whatever first (especially ancient
Greeks, Romans, etc.). I feel most of this stuff presented should
be common knowledge. My source is life itself. My
knowledge. And how can one expect to get smarter if one does not
share their knowledge with others? But also credit should be
given where credit is due. So many different writings and so many
different sources on encounters in a lifetime of 52+ years. My
thoughts and experiences are truly my own as well as yours are
yours. But credit to whom or who can be difficult in an
undertaking such as this. So thanks to the science of everything
for contributing to this page. And thanks from me, Na'ar (Kiddo,
Youth) to Shaddai (Almighty, God) for all these processes and such that
giveth and taketh away our thoughts. And to end on a footnote.1
1 My thoughts exactly. All this typing just to say
"global warming is a smokescreen and a bunch of BS". Such is the
sad state of affairs of the scientific community anymore. So be
it. I came. I saw and heard. Then, finally, I typed.
copyright 2017. Thee
Man & Strategic Book Group. All rights reserved